On gio, 2008-07-03 at 14:10 +0200, Jan Willies wrote: ... > >>> These optimizations should be applied also to gcc and uclibc and any > >>> other package that provides diff between versions. > >>> > >>> Thanks a lot for your comments. > >> > >> -ENOPATCH ? > >> > >> > > > > I don't understand. What do you mean? > > He thinks it's a good idea and likes to see a patch :) >
Oh. I usually ask opinion to the ml... to understand if a feature is interesting or simply useless... I already proposed patches for other things... and I'm not a chap that ask to the others to do something :) (http://repo.or.cz/w/openwrt_comio.git) >From this... I hope to have time to create a proof-of-concept patch to cover my rfc. Anyway... what do you think about this "feature"? is it stupid? already implemented?... thanks luigi > > - Jan > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel -- ______ Luigi Mantellini .'______'. R&D - Software (.' '.) Industrie Dial Face S.p.A. ( :=----=: ) Via Canzo, 4 ('.______.') 20068 Peschiera Borromeo (MI), Italy '.______.' Tel.: +39 02 5167 2813 Fax: +39 02 5167 2459 Ind. Dial Face Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.idf-hit.com GPG fingerprint: 3DD1 7B71 FBDF 6376 1B4A B003 175F E979 907E 1650 _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
