The OpenWrt build system is designed by someone who loves Makefiles. The OpenEmbedded build system is designed by someone who despises Makefiles. T2 seems to be run by someone who despises other open source projects (read the website to make your own judgement). You'll never be able to merge any of them due to the people, not the technology. (I use and develop for both OpenWrt and OpenEmbedded) -- Rod
-----Original Message----- From: Stanislav Sinyagin <[email protected]> Date: Friday, Jan 9, 2009 1:18 am Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt development process To: OpenWrt Development List <[email protected]>Reply-To: OpenWrt Development List <[email protected]> Speaking of distributions, T2 is also worth looking at: >http://www.t2-project.org/ >I was going to spend some time in learning it deeper, but the Christmas >holidays appeared to be too short :) > > > > >----- Original Message ---- > From: Jose Vasconcellos <[email protected]> > I think this topic merits additional discussion. I'm not very > familiar with OpenEmbedded but I'm starting to look into it. > As I see it, OpenEmbedded is trying to create a platform for > the creating of embedded distributions. OpenWrt is dealing > with creating a distribution geared towards the specifics of > routers (networking issues and HW specifics related to that). > However, the approach of OpenEmbedded looks very good, > at least, from their documentation. Has anyone compared the > two build systems approaches? >_______________________________________________ >openwrt-devel mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
