Which leaves my 3rd question. Should I rather post them here or on the website trac? Is one prefered to the other?
.. Bud Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 19:38, Bud <[email protected]> wrote: >> I just read on >> https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/SubmittingPatches >> >> that patches should be delivered as follows >> >> Send a mail to openwrt-devel <at> lists.openwrt.org with the following >> contents: >> 1. [PATCH] <short description> in the Subject, followed by: >> 2. (optional) a longer description of your patch in the message body >> 3. Signed-off-by: Your name <y...@…> >> 4. Your actual patch, inline, not word wrapped or whitespace mangled. >> >> Why is it so? Is there an automated process integrating them? > > The reasoning behind this is actually mentionted 2 lines below the > lines you're quoting: > to mimic the Linux kernel patch submission process. > >> What about additions (new files) that are not version controlled yet? > > Diff handles them fine (difference against empty/nonexistent file). > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- > [email protected] > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like > that. > -- Linus Torvalds > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
