Hi Daniel,

Le Saturday 01 August 2009 11:03:22 Daniel Dickinson, vous avez écrit :
> On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:25:20 +0200
> Florian Fainelli <flor...@openwrt.org> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Please find below a proof-of-concept of the mklibs.py reduction
> > integration in OpenWrt. I have not been able to strip the uClibc
> > loader more than 4KB out of 28KB (original size) but it might
> > significantly better results with more softare installed in the
> > rootfs. --- Index: Config.in
> Doesn't mklibs.py remove portions of a library that are unused?

It does indeed.

> Wouldn't that mean that fewer programs would result in more removal
> (due to more unused bits).   Or do you strip all libraries and not just
> uClibc?

I think I did not ask it to strip down all shared libraries, thus it only 
stripped down the linker. I will try to look at it later in the weekend.
Best regards, Florian Fainelli
Email: flor...@openwrt.org
Web: http://openwrt.org
IRC: [florian] on irc.freenode.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

openwrt-devel mailing list

Reply via email to