Luigi Mantellini wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Felix Fietkau <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Can we plan to integrate xz utils in the next future? (deprecating >>> lzma and lzma-old packages). >> We need the lzma library anyway (for squashfs). What advantages are >> there to using the xz utility? > > xz (formerly lzma-utils) contains the lzma library and the complete > application suite to manage the lzma files (lzma alone), also using > the standard gzip cmdline interface (as linux kernel likes). > > I know that it's just an alternative... for this reason I'm asking for > a ml opinion. IMHO if it ever becomes useful for us, then we should add it. But I don't really believe in switching to it just for the sake of changing something.
- Felix _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
