You did earlier (9.12.2009) ..
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2009-December/005384.html
anyway you are right. They can be pulled manually as well. These vars
were set in "white russian", but didn't survive "kamikaze". I feel they
are convenient.
LANDEV is missing because it seems to accumulate multiple local devices e.g.
network.lan.device=eth0.0 wl0
But if nobody wants this patch, I am fine with it ... Just wanted to know.
regards ede
On 15.04.2010 16:15, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Edgar,
I fail to see the purpose of this patch.
Why is WANDEV defined but not LANDEV?
Why this aliases and no general mechanism?
What happens if I renamed my wan interface, removed it etc.?
Why can't includes that need those vars just pull them?
~ Jow
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkvHH5QACgkQdputYINPTPNFtgCeP8VPTH8F7zM6LtIBooWwkIKn
ZIgAn3p9niMMtZnP0S/qcwLNR2zgSSqi
=I0yh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
