Hi All! Any other comments? Is it a must to move to at91 or it can be standalone target? Is something else necessary to get this patch committed?
Regards, Maxim On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Maxim Osipov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Imre Kaloz <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:16:02 +0200, Maxim Osipov <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> target/linux/flexibity >> >> Why a new target? It seems to be an AT91 board. Integrate it there. > > IMHO OpenWRT target is more like a platform rather then an > architecture. I.e. it defines kernel configuration (specific to a > board, not processor), default packages, etc. > > So in my opinion it is logical to have a separate target for each > supported board. Or there is some other possibility to have a > board-level configuration? > > Kind regards, > Maxim > _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
