On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Dennis M.D. Ljungmark <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 12:02 +0200, Jonas Gorski wrote: >> On 22 September 2010 11:32, Dennis M.D. Ljungmark <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Looks like the dockstar would be near perfect for me, cheap and nice and >> > prefab. >> > >> > The bifferboard looks _very_ tempting though I fear the lack of FPU may >> > cause SSL to be a bit of a tight fit. Though I guess some ciphers might >> > work decently as long as there isn't too much data. >> >> None of the mentioned devices have an FPU. But SSL doesn't use >> floating point anyway, except for some time keeping stuff for >> benchmarking, so it shouldn't matter. >> >> If you are looking for SSL speed, the kirkwood SoC might be what you >> need; they are not only fast, but also have an additional crypto core, >> which is supposed to be able to get 300 Mbit/s throughput. (I don't >> know if OpenSSL currently supports it, at least there is a linux >> driver for it). Also, they are quite openly documented by Marvell. > > > True point about SSL/fp math ( though vectorization features are lovely, > which also makes the modern style ARM's more interesting ) and we're > not looking at throughput there as much as many & repeated (costly) > setup/teardown cycles. > > Right now, the sheevaplug/Seagate looks like a very good place to start > with proof of concept setup, (along with the guruplug devkit) > > Anything beats the via systems (686 without cmov) and their notoriously > broken/flaky USB-support which is enough to give me nightmares ;) > > Thanks again, everyone > DmD > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >
Be aware guruplug seems to have thermal design (heat) issue. Xianghua _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
