> for micro images usually busybox is used and awk/sed are available > busybox applets. i really doubt that the size increase is in > proportion to the rework (including bugfixing) the already working > code.
think future: do we ever rely on busybox? maybe some users use e.g. toybox[1] later? bye, Bastian. [1] http://www.landley.net/code/toybox/about.html _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
