On 13/03/11 15:24, Luca Olivetti wrote: > Al 27/02/11 20:30, En/na ralph.hem...@lantiq.com ha escrit: > >> maybe this is more of interest for you ? >> http://nbd.name/gitweb.cgi?p=owsip.git >> connect pjsip & tapi > > Regarding this one, I see that owsip uses pjsip-ltq-tapi. > > The initialization done in pjsip-ltq-tapi seems quite simpler than > the one done in tapidemo: > > tapidemo (device_vmmc.c) gets the address registered with lq_register_tapi, > (didn't investigate yet the meaning of that address), uses it to check > if the firmware has already been downloaded, otherwise downloads the > firmware with the FIO_FW_DOWNLOAD ioctl, then downloads the BBD(?) > using the FIO_BBD_DOWNLOAD ioctl. > > the pjsip tapi adaptation (tapi_dev.c) does almost nothing of the above, > it just uses FIO_FW_DOWNLOAD. > > Since both those files carry an Infineon copyright, which one is the > "right" procedure? > > Obviously tapidemo is right (since it works), but I'd like to know it > tapi_dev.c is also right since it's simpler. > > I'm asking since I found a supposedly working sip client using IFX_TAPI, > and I'd like to adapt it to my board, but since I'm not very good with C > I'll have to do some cutting & pasting, so I'd like to cut & paste the > right stuff (and possibly the simplest one) and not the wrong stuff. > > Bye
you will have to wait till i finished owsip and merge it in openwrt. i know that you are really anxious, 95% of lantiq related mails are from you, however, it is not ready.so you will have to wait. _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
