On 04/28/11 18:29, Linus Lüssing wrote: > In my opinion, that should be okay, but I'm also using IPv6 > regularly. What would be the alternative, installing the bridge as > a kernel module instead of kernel built-in as it is currently done? > > Hmm, if no one is screaming about any space issues and not wanting > to have IPv6 installed, I guess it should be fine to have the IPv6 > code built-in, shouldn't it? > > Screaming? No, but it would be good to see what the cost in space was before comitting it.
The old 2.4 kernel left ~1.5M fee on my linksys, the 2.6 one redices it to 800K, so space is, or will soon become, an issue, and it's a still a (largely) IPv4 only world out there. -A _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
