On 7/7/11 9:17 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On Thursday 07 July 2011 18:08:49 Philip Prindeville wrote: >> On 7/7/11 8:59 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>> On Thursday 07 July 2011 17:49:33 Philip Prindeville wrote: >>>> I'm not sure how much good it does to keep up with the latest version of >>>> eglibc if we've not had Openwrt building against eglibc for 6 months or >>>> more. >>>> >>>> I've put a few patches out there that at least got all the packages I >>>> use regularly building with eglibc but they're still waiting for >>>> commit. >>> Since building recent eglibc version does not necessary work okay for >>> achitectures different than x86, let's at least provide an up-to-date >>> version to start reporting problems upstream with. >> For what it's worth, also, I've not seem to many problems with eglibc >> itself. >> >> It seems to be fairly solid. > Yeah, because you are building for x86, which is something I really do not > care because there is enough coverage for it. > -- > Florian
Which makes it all the stranger that it hasn't built reliably since November in Openwrt. _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
