Hello,

On Monday 29 August 2011 10:22:47 Emmanuel Deloget wrote:
> Apologies if you receive this twice. It was supposed to be sent on last
> friday, but it seems it wasn't - or at least, I didn't got it back -
> which is weird since I didn't lost any other message.

It was, see my reply on the list and to you [1]. Note that your email 
addressed bounced on Friday.

[1]: https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2011-August/012031.html

> 
> ---8<-------------
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm not sure whether this is by design or if this is a mistake, but when
> one does a
> 
>    make toolchain/kernel-headers/prepare
> 
> the build process applies the generic patches (in
> $(GENERIC_PLATFORM_DIR)/paches-$(KERNEL_VERSION)) but not the ones that
> are located in the specific platform subtree. This has an undesireable
> consequence: when one wants to modify a linux header that can be used by
> some userspace program, he must add its platform-specific patch in the
> generic subtree - otherwise the changes to the header file are not visible.
> 
> The same remark applies for the platfom files/ directory, which contains
> potentially important header files as well.
> 
> In my opinion, the kernel-headers toolchain package shall have no
> patches/ and no files/ - that doesn't make much sense. I cannot see any
> reason were one would want to have user-space kernel header files that
> are not tied to the kernel-space ones. Since the patches are applied on
> the linux tree, they should be added into to linux generic patch dir
> (same remark for the files), so maybe one can just set PATCH_DIR to
> $(PLATFORM_DIR)/patches-$(KERNEL_VERSION) (or something like that) in
> kernel-headers/Makefile - or change the Kernel/Patch/Default rule so
> that it always apply the platform patches - and not the patches in
> PATCH_DIR (since this variable depends on the package).
> 
> So, honnest mistake or design choice? (i.e. what should I do with this
> report?)
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> --
> Emmanuel Deloget
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

-- 
Florian
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to