I'm trying the patch Gioacchino,
so now config should look something like this ?
config mini_snmpd
option enabled 1
option ipv6 0
option community public
option location 'Via Gallia'
option contact '[email protected]'
option interfaces 'lan'
option interfaces 'wan'
Saverio
2011/10/15 Gioacchino Mazzurco <[email protected]>:
> hu sorry that was an error!
>
> that was only a rename to not conflict between my testing repository
> and packages
>
> you can fix the patch or i can fix it and send a new patch as you prefer ;)
>
> thanks!
>
> 2011/10/15 Nico <[email protected]>:
>> Hi Gioacchino,
>>
>> Your patch will also rename mini-snmpd to eigen-mini-snmpd, which is a
>> totally unrelated change ? Why ?
>>
>> --
>> -{Nico}
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Gioacchino Mazzurco
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Last fixed patch ;)
>>> Please use only that and ignore the two patch before
>>>
>>> On Saturday 15 October 2011 10:39:13 Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
>>>> Better patch also more openwrt styled makefile
>>>>
>>>> On Friday 14 October 2011 12:23:45 Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
>>>> > I have done a patch that make mini_snmpd more uci style
>>>> >
>>>> > +Instead of one option with comma separated interfaces now use uci list
>>>> > +Intestad of use only real interface name now can use also uci interface
>>>> > name the init script check if the interface name specified is from uci
>>>> > than traslate it to real name interface if not check if the interface
>>>> > exist then add it if not exist print an error message and ignore the
>>>> > interface
>>>> >
>>>> > suggestion are welcomed ;)
>>>> >
>>>> > On Friday 14 October 2011 11:04:20 you wrote:
>>>> > > Hey all!
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I see that in mini_snmpd config you have to use a list of real name
>>>> > > interfaces comma separated, that not the uci style...
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I am thinking to write a patch to use uci list instead of option and
>>>> > > more over you can use uci network name also instead of real name
>>>> > > interface only
>>>> > >
>>>> > > What do you thinks about that ?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> openwrt-devel mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openwrt-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>>
>
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
