On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Mark Mentovai <[email protected]> wrote: > Jonathan Bennett wrote: >> This patch seems like a really good idea for the ar71xx family. What >> sorts of problems are preventing this from being implemented? As small >> as it sounds, an extra 192k would be really useful on quite a few >> routers. > > I don't know of any actual problems with the patch. When I originally > proposed the patch on this list, Dave Taht was concerned that it might > not leave enough headroom to field-update the kernel with a larger one > (https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2011-August/012026.html),
I withdraw my objections. > although my position is that this is what the configuration-preserving > sysupgrade feature is for > (https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2011-August/012033.html). although I would like the field update feature to become ever more robust. -- Dave Täht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 FR Tel: 0638645374 http://www.bufferbloat.net _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
