On 31 January 2012 13:21, Tobias Diedrich <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think that this is definitely a good thing. >> But we must be careful to fully switch to it because, eg., belkin >> board I have (and probably others with external switch) requires >> double tagging control to enable external switch (will post a patch >> for current trunk a bit later). > > Hmm, interesting. > Does that have to do with the FCT2/FPA2 registers? > I had to use different init values for those for my WL-351. > And I configured the switch to not untag and pass on vlans 0-15 to > get it to work somewhat.
See the patch I've just sent to the list. > If you have a datasheet, is there a bit to maybe disable the vlan > support of the internal switch so it'll just pass on the packets > like a dumb switch? That should simplify things when the internal > switch isn't really used at all like in said WL-351. Datasheet is available in the internet ;) Yes, you were right, we can just disable vlans to get it working. > Double tagging sounds like something you'd want to avoid if at all > possible. :) Yes, theoretically it adds some overhead, so I commented out double tagging in the patch. Regards, Roman _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
