Al 15/02/12 17:28, En/na Ithamar R. Adema ha escrit: > On 02/15/2012 12:01 AM, Luca Olivetti wrote: >> Doxygen documentation is only useful as a complement to proper documentation >> (which exists but it's not publicly available). >> The difference is like night and day. > The person asking for this information says he's working for a large telco, > somehow I don't think he'll have any problems getting the TAPI documentation > if they're going to do a product with Lantiq hardware.....
That's true, in that case the documentation is outstanding > > The fact that there is no _open_ documentation available (yet) does not make > it unusable.... I know, I managed to add various features to an existing program using TAPI, but it wasn't easy, almost impossible if I had to start from scratch....and couldn't find documentation on some chines site ;-) > Last time I checked the Linux kernel is full of badly documented features ;-) and of many source files were the only comment is the GPL notice ;-) Bye -- Luca _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
