On 08/30/2011 12:50 PM, Eugene San wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've spoken with driver maintainer and he promised to look into it. We
> should see second part of patch as temporary solution before upstream
> fixes the issue.
> 
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:14, Florian Fainelli <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     Hello,
> 
>     On Monday 29 August 2011 22:11:55 [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>     > From: "Eugene San (eugenesan)" <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >
>     >
>     > Signed-off-by: Eugene San (eugenesan) <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     > ---
>     >  package/mac80211/Makefile                          |    4 +-
>     >  .../701-mwl8k-firmware-reload-workaround.patch     |   29
>     > ++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>     >  create mode 100644
>     > package/mac80211/patches/701-mwl8k-firmware-reload-workaround.patch
> 
>     The first patch looks obviously correct, what about sending the second
>     upstream?
> 
>     >
>     > diff --git a/package/mac80211/Makefile b/package/mac80211/Makefile
>     > index e2942f8..3fdd691 100644
>     > --- a/package/mac80211/Makefile
>     > +++ b/package/mac80211/Makefile
>     > @@ -1326,14 +1326,14 @@ define KernelPackage/ath9k-htc/install
>     >  endef
>     >
>     >  define KernelPackage/mwl8k/install
>     > -     $(INSTALL_DIR) $(1)/lib/firmware
>     > +     $(INSTALL_DIR) $(1)/lib/firmware/mwl8k/
>     >       $(INSTALL_DATA) \
>     >
>     $(PKG_BUILD_DIR)/$(PKG_LINUX_FIRMWARE_SUBDIR)/mwl8k/fmimage_8366_ap-2.fw
>     > \
>     $(PKG_BUILD_DIR)/$(PKG_LINUX_FIRMWARE_SUBDIR)/mwl8k/fmimage_8366.fw \
>     > $(PKG_BUILD_DIR)/$(PKG_LINUX_FIRMWARE_SUBDIR)/mwl8k/helper_8366.fw \
>     > $(PKG_BUILD_DIR)/$(PKG_LINUX_FIRMWARE_SUBDIR)/mwl8k/fmimage_8687.fw \
>     > $(PKG_BUILD_DIR)/$(PKG_LINUX_FIRMWARE_SUBDIR)/mwl8k/helper_8687.fw \
>     > -             $(1)/lib/firmware/
>     > +             $(1)/lib/firmware/mwl8k/
>     >  endef
>     >
I committed the first part of the patch in r30642 as this was obviously
wrong in OpenWrt. I have never worked on mwl8k so I can not say anything
about the second part. What is about the plan to upstream the first patch?

Hauke
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to