On 03/05/2012 04:50 AM, Nathan Hintz wrote: > Attached is an updated patch for comment. > > 1) Does adding the common section even make sense, if not, I will delete it? > 2) I moved the entries that were obviously ARM or MIPS, are these correct > and are there others that should be moved? > > I initially created another version that simply added the manufacturer ID's > as another element in the device_names table, but then tumbled to this > (smaller footprint/more efficient). > > Thanks, > > Nathan
Thank you for the patch. It was committed in r30875. I removed the common part as I do not think we need it, every core has a vendor id. I also made all structs and functions static as they are not used outside of this file. Could you also send this patch for inclusion into the linux mainline kernel. Hauke _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
