Hi, On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:43:36PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > It's documented here: http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/dhcp6c
Oh! This is tremendously cool! Thanks to everyone who made that
possible.
Nit to pick: calling this "sla_len" is a bit weird. Especially if
you don't know whether the ISP will assign a /48, /56 or /60, this
sounds a bit awkward to ensure /64 on an interface - or am I misreading
this?
Anyway, finally need to get my act together and setup the ISP-side of
DHCP-PD - so far, our IPv6 customers had manually-configured IPv6 prefixes,
but I *want* DHCP-PD so "off-the-shelf CPEs" will work just automatically,
and this is enough of an incentive to get going :-)
> I haven't actually tried it; I have to manually configure the range of
> Legacy IP addresses anyway, so it's easy enough to configure the IPv6
> too. But I *will* try it, and make sure it interoperates with my ISP
> correctly.
>
> We should make sure it's enabled by default.
That, and IPv6 for PPP (for PPP-enabled WAN interfaces).
> There should be no need for anyone to disable IPv6, except perhaps if
> they mean by that "turn off automatic 6to4". If they're stuck in the
> 20th century and don't have IPv6 routing, they won't get IPv6. What's to
> disable?
+1, and do *not* turn on "automatic 6to4" - that's known to be harmful,
and "no IPv6" is much more useful today than "IPv6 only via 6to4".
> (And no, I wouldn't advocate 6to4 being enabled by default anyway).
+1 :-)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpYFxWQZWPP8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
