On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Dominique Martinet <asmad...@codewreck.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Gui Iribarren wrote on Thu, Jul 05, 2012 : >> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Dominique Martinet >> <asmad...@codewreck.org> wrote: >> > config dhcp 'lan' >> > option interface 'lan' >> > option ra_names '2001:dead:beef::' >> >> I understand this serves the double purpose of activating this >> feature, and at the same time making dnsmasq send RA, so no radvd is >> needed >> or does it depend on RA sent by radvd ? >> in the second case, wouldn't it make sense to get the "prefix" config >> directly from /etc/config/radvd instead of duplicating information? > > It effectively makes radvd unneeded (but harmless, I just tried with > both running with my previous radvd configuration), so it seems better > to give the prefix here. Agree, great to know. > I'm pretty sure it would be possible to have the same feature with > announces only from radvd and dnsmasq passively listening, but I didn't > find a way to do so and for what I've been using radvd it doesn't seem > to change much.
I'm currently using the "config rdnss" feature of radvd so that SLAAC hosts also get a DNS server entry, again independent of dhcpv4. I assume that's also possible with this new scheme, right? i could search about it on dnsmasq documentation , but you seem to have immersed in the subject much more than i could achieve right now. _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
