Jow,
Thanks for your suggestion.
> I meant yes, you should amend 610-MIPS-openwrt-machines.patch .
I'm getting little confused (partially because my original question was not
precise).
(a) Make a patch that applies to the 610-MIPS-ath79-openwrt-machines.patch.
(b) Make a new patch that is applied to files already patched by the 610-MIPS
patch
and call it something like
611-MIPS-ath79-openwrt-machines_add_wlae-ag300n.patch
In my personal impression, the option (a) would produce something not too
intuitive to look at...
--- shinoda
On 2012/07/24, at 17:56, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Oops, I missed the "or" :)
> I meant yes, you should amend 610-MIPS-openwrt-machines.patch .
>
> ~ Jow
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlAOY1oACgkQdputYINPTPOu5QCgoCKE1TJ0glERskjJz6oXLuS3
> eQcAnj/EzGahkt9G7xZkbhyiMXFzA+Em
> =sMqE
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
