On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 02:59:41AM +0200, Oliver wrote:
> On Friday 27 July 2012 01:09:43 Mirko Vogt wrote:
> > On 07/27/2012 12:24 AM, Oliver wrote:
> > > As it stands, it is *impossible* to build any of the dhcp tools with IPv6
> > > support due to this bug, so something should be done in the interim.
> > 
> > You might have a valid point, however your attitude to _demand_ getting
> > this fixed (instead of just politely calling attention to this issue or,
> > even better, fixing it yourself and sending a patch) is rather..
> > discouraging.
> 
> I created and submitted the original package, nobody bothered to at least try 
> e-mailing me about doing the version bump or reworking it in an acceptable, 
> unbroken manner

You were not in MAINTAINER macro.

> so yes, I am admittedly a bit peeved - I absolutely have no 
> issue with someone doing a version bump or whatever else if they're not 
> breaking functionality, so don't interpret this to mean that I think this is 
> "my" package.
> 
> However, if you or anyone else who has commit access would like to tell me 
> what method of fixing it would be acceptable - either relying on CONFIG_IPV6, 
> defacto enabling or creating pseudo-packages that contain the same binary but 
> with IPv6 enabled, I have absolutely no problem with submitting a patch.

I'll fix it.

Luka
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to