See http://www.alldatasheet.com/view.jsp?Searchword=ADM6996
08.08.2012, 16:24, "Peter Lebbing" <[email protected]>: > Hello all, > > Back in May 2011, I wrote a driver for VLANs (swconfig) for the ADM6996M > switch > chip. It turned out that the ADM6996FC chip has the exact same identification > number. It is also quite similar in operation (the M is more advanced). I > didn't > have an FC chip myself, and I didn't have a datasheet either. A slightly > modified version of my driver did appear to work, according one of the people > who helped me figure out how to differentiate an M model from an FC model. I > posted the modification to the mailing list, but I didn't ask for it to be > applied to OpenWRT trunk. I had no way to verify for myself that everything > worked as it should, so I did not want to sign off on it. > > Currently, I was thinking that perhaps I'd like to implement priority queues > for > the M model: there is now a VoIP line running over that switch. This sparked > my > interest again, and I decided to do something else as well. I just bought a > cheap second hand Fritz!Box Fon WLAN 7170. I intend to thoroughly test if the > FC > chip in that box does what I expect it to do, and then submit the patch that > enables support for the FC chip in the driver. > > And now I come to the request part and the reason I wrote this mail. > > I've been searching for that blasted datasheet for the FC model again. And > frustratingly, it has actually been seen in the wild, at: > > <http://www.infineon.convergy.de/upload/documents/techdoc/GF_15/Samurai_6FC_FCX_FHX_VAD_DS_Rev1.4.pdf> > > Even more frustratingly, the Internet Archive has actually archived that > directory, but alas, it misses that file: > > <http://wayback.archive.org/web/*/http://www.infineon.convergy.de/upload/documents/techdoc/GF_15/*> > > That, right there, is really mean! > > Does anybody here have that PDF? I could really use it! > > And I should note that Infineon/ADMtek has sold a number of chips with ADM6996 > in the name, and they differ greatly. While the FC model might be advertised > as > a lower-power alternative for the F chip, they are not comparable from a > driver > point of view. The L chip is similar to the F chip (so also not useful). > Interestingly, that I/IX model that is listed by the Internet Archive /is/ > quite > similar to the M and FC models. > > I hope someone can help me out! > > Peter. > > -- > I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail. > You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy. > My key is available at http://wwwhome.cs.utwente.nl/~lebbing/pubkey.txt > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel --- serge _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
