2013/2/12 Nathan Hintz <[email protected]>:
> The last two hunks of this patch were approved by Rafał, and were pushed
> upstream.  However, the first hunk still remains.  Rafał's response was
> via private email; however, there has been no response to my replies
> back to him with the rationale... perhaps blocked in some way.  Anyway,
> the rationale for the first hunk is that the readback of "BGMAC_INT_MASK"
> is specified at the following:
>
>         Step 2, http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/mac-gbit/gmac/chipintrsoff
>
> Hopefully, this gets through.

I'm sorry:

1) For sending e-mail privately (I didn't mean to)

2) For being a little angry/rude on not-upstreaming patches. It's a
real pain to build/develop OpenWRT. Even switching to external tree
causes problems. Switching kernel causes many patches not apply
anymore. Applying patches in a git repo is pain too. That's why I
insist on upstreaming patches and I can't understand why there some
few-liners not mainlined for 2 years. To make it works authors of that
patches ignore my questions :|

3) For not replying earlier. I was spending *all* my free (and not
only) time on bgmac last days.

I've upstreamed two obvious fixes as soon as possible (Cc-ed you), at
that time I wasn't sure about interrupts change yet. I also wasn't
sure if interrupts are working correctly on my device, so I couldn't
really test it.

-- 
Rafał
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to