Either way is fine with me. If you are willing go ahead and pick it up on Friday.
On 2/25/13 12:21 PM, "Jonas Gorski" <[email protected]> wrote: >On 25 February 2013 16:59, Chirag Chhatriwala <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Imre Kaloz <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:45:38 +0100, Florian Fainelli >>><[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 02/25/2013 11:05 AM, Imre Kaloz wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:29:20 +0100, Maarten Bezemer >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It seems that Imre Kaloz (the target maintainer) is not available? >>>>>> Is it possible that the patch gets reviewed/committed by someone >>>>>>else? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Orion will be moved to DT, so 3.7 support won't be commited at all. >>>> >>>> >>>> Sounds like a good plan and a lot of work at the same time, would not >>>>it >>>> be beneficial for users to have an interim 3.7 support for them to >>>>test? >>> >>> >>> I rather not at another outdated kernel. 3.7 doesn't bring any critical >>> feature for us. >>> >> >> Sorry for my ignorance but what does "Orion will be moved to DT" mean ? > >Device Tree aka Open Firmware. Apart from that is 3.7 almost dead, so >if any new kernel, then 3.8. > > >Jonas >_______________________________________________ >openwrt-devel mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
