I have a number of (admittedly) ancient Netgear WGT634U's in the field
doing duty as free-wifi hotspots. Recent builds of our standard set
of tools have become unhappy in the last year or so. For example,
here are the RES memory sizes of processes on our workload, comparing
r37911 (current) with r34240 (circa Nov 18, 2012):
r37911 r34240
RSS command RSS command
3700 gateway 3000 gateway (nocatauth, w/ perl)
1400 snmpd 1240 snmpd
1196 openvpn 3400 openvpn
736 olsrd 628 olsrd
732 olsrd 572 olsrd
664 netifd 268 netifd
656 procd 76 init
104 init
108 rcS
632 top 612 top
532 dropbear 540 dropbear
496 ash 480 ash
492 logread 168 syslogd
488 hostapd 392 hostapd
456 crond 332 crond
448 udhcpc * (used static config, so no udhcpc)
248 hotplug2
420 dropbear 188 dropbear
384 logger 172 logger
164 logger
380 sh
376 dnsmasq 440 dnsmasq
372 radvd 188 radvd
256 radvd 320 radvd
364 ntpclient 200 ntpclient
280 ubusd 56 ubusd
272 sleep
224 askfirst
68 ??
84 watchdog
------------- -----------------
15956 14048
Today's resident size is almost 2 megabytes larger than a year ago,
even after a substantial improvement in the openvpn size (I switched
to polarssl).
Admittedly, the numbers are just a convenience sample (r37911 just
booted, r34240 has been up for 44 days) and might not be a fair
comparison in all cases. But, the direction here seems to be making
the WGT634U less viable for us.
Are these numbers illuminating at all?
--
Russell Senior, President
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel