This was fixed in r39935 I think: http://openwrt.nanobit.org/changeset/39935/trunk/package/utils/busybox/files/sysntpd
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Weedy <[email protected]> wrote: > Please accept this patch. > > On 28 Feb 2014 14:16, "Vittorio G (VittGam)" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> This patch fixes a regression introduced with r38787. >> >> Before patching: >> /usr/sbin/ntpd -n -l -p server1 server2 server3 server4 >> >> After patching: >> /usr/sbin/ntpd -n -l -p server1 -p server2 -p server3 -p server4 >> >> Signed-off-by: Vittorio Gambaletta <[email protected]> >> --- >> >> --- a/trunk/package/utils/busybox/files/sysntpd 2013-11-28 >> 12:28:40.000000000 +0100 >> +++ b/trunk/package/utils/busybox/files/sysntpd 2014-02-28 >> 19:51:48.957785869 +0100 >> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ >> procd_open_instance >> procd_set_param command "$PROG" -n >> [ "$enable_server" = "1" ] && procd_append_param command -l >> - for peer in "$server"; do >> + for peer in $server; do >> procd_append_param command -p $peer >> done >> procd_set_param respawn >> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
