On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 10:44:38AM +0200, José Vázquez wrote: > Sure? maybe i am a bit blind. :(
You are not - I've missed it... Thanks. I guess it was too early in the morning :) Luka > V1: > Eliminated: DEPENDS:=+zlib +pciutils +dmidecode +libftdi > +libusb-compat @(arm||armeb||i386||i686||x86_64) > Added: DEPENDS:=+zlib +pciutils +dmidecode +libftdi +libusb-compat > V2: > Eliminated: DEPENDS:=+zlib +pciutils +dmidecode +libftdi > +libusb-compat @(arm||armeb||i386||i686||x86_64) > Added: DEPENDS:=+zlib +pciutils +TARGET_x86:dmidecode +libftdi +libusb-compat > > Pepe > > 2014-05-09 10:34 GMT+02:00, Luka Perkov <l...@openwrt.org>: > > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 10:28:50AM +0200, José Vázquez wrote: > >> 2014-05-09 8:32 GMT+02:00, Luka Perkov <l...@openwrt.org>: > >> > Hi Alvaro, > >> > > >> > I don't see this change. Patch v2 is same as v1. > >> > > >> > Luka > >> > > >> In v1 he eliminated cpu dependencies while in v2 dmidecode is only > >> selected by TARGET_x86. > >> I think that, in addition to x86 should be added x86_64 and any other > >> target that has dmi. > > > > Yes, it says that in the description but the patches are the same. > > > > Luka > > _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
