Is there something blocking this from becoming accepted? I can see the patches have been delegated to Gabor Juhos, but nothing has happened with them for weeks. If I need to change something, please let me know. Also, is it too late to add my name to the copyright message in mach-esr900.c? Would that even be appropriate when I didn't write most of the code? This is the first free software project I've contributed to so I'm a little unsure of myself when it comes to what I should or should not take credit for.
-- Forest Crossman On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Forest Crossman <[email protected]> wrote: > Apparrently, Gmail likes to mangle patches if you send them from the web > interface. This patch series contains a slightly cleaned-up version of the > original patch. > > Forest Crossman (3): > ar71xx: add kernel support for the EnGenius ESR900 > ar71xx: add board support for the EnGenius ESR900 > ar71xx: add user-space support for the EnGenius ESR900 > > package/base-files/files/lib/functions/system.sh | 1 + > target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh | 3 + > .../ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds | 5 + > .../ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/02_network | 10 + > target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/ar71xx.sh | 3 + > target/linux/ar71xx/config-3.10 | 1 + > .../ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-esr900.c | 222 > +++++++++++++++++++++ > target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/nvram.c | 16 ++ > target/linux/ar71xx/generic/profiles/engenius.mk | 16 ++ > target/linux/ar71xx/image/Makefile | 2 + > .../610-MIPS-ath79-openwrt-machines.patch | 18 +- > 11 files changed, 294 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-esr900.c > create mode 100644 target/linux/ar71xx/generic/profiles/engenius.mk > > -- > 1.9.2 > _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
