ouch that hurts i just saw the asus bit being removed and assumed the rest is correct.
let me fix it after i ate my dinner @roger: shame on you .... On 19/09/2014 17:21, Michael Heimpold wrote: > Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold <m...@heimpold.de> > --- > > I just stumbled over r42619 and wondered, whether we should not keep the > <boardname>:<color>:<function> naming scheme. Or is there a reason > to not follow this convention? > > Yours, > Michael > > target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds | 2 +- > target/linux/ramips/dts/DIR-810L.dts | 8 ++++---- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds > b/target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds > index bf646ed..5c57956 100755 > --- a/target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds > +++ b/target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds > @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ case $board in > set_wifi_led "d-link:green:wifi" > ;; > dir-810l) > - ucidef_set_led_default "power" "POWER" "dlink:power:green" "1" > + ucidef_set_led_default "power" "POWER" "d-link:green:power" "1" > ;; > dir-610-a1 |\ > dir-300-b7 |\ > diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/dts/DIR-810L.dts > b/target/linux/ramips/dts/DIR-810L.dts > index 5dd8859..dd0d39c 100644 > --- a/target/linux/ramips/dts/DIR-810L.dts > +++ b/target/linux/ramips/dts/DIR-810L.dts > @@ -117,15 +117,15 @@ > gpio-leds { > compatible = "gpio-leds"; > power { > - label = "dlink:power:green"; > + label = "d-link:green:power"; > gpios = <&gpio0 9 0>; > }; > - internet { > - label = "dlink:internet:orange"; > + wan { > + label = "d-link:orange:wan"; > gpios = <&gpio0 12 0>; > }; > status { > - label = "dlink:power:orange"; > + label = "d-link:orange:power"; > gpios = <&gpio0 13 0>; > }; > }; _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel