On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 04:38:47PM +0100, Imre Kaloz wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:23:43 +0100, Maxime Ripard > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Hi Imre, > > > >On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:50:55PM +0100, Imre Kaloz wrote: > >>On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:56:45 +0100, Maxime Ripard > >><[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>>++ partition@2 { > >>>++ label = "data"; > >>>++ reg = <0x600000 0xa00000>; > >>>++ }; > >>>+ }; > >>>+ }; > >>>+ > >> > >>This one should be called "rootfs". The image/Makefile change should be > >>part > >>of the UBI on NOR discussion/patch, so please make that one a separate. > > > >You mean a separate patch, right? > > > >Separated from what? The rest of the serie? This patch is pretty > >standalone by itself. > > Sorry, I wanted to say that one patch should add the partitions and another > should be the image/Makefile change, given the first is likely to be > upstreamed.
I don't really think it can. This kind of data is really setup specific, and I'm not sure that the mainline kernel wants to enforce any kind of policy there. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
