On 22/03/2015 00:31, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 21 March 2015 at 23:18, John Crispin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 21/03/2015 23:15, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> On 21 March 2015 at 06:06, wengbj <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: wengbj <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> target/linux/ramips/dts/FIREWRT.dts | 5 +++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/dts/FIREWRT.dts
>>>> b/target/linux/ramips/dts/FIREWRT.dts
>>>> index 54f0e55..2b018e6 100644
>>>> --- a/target/linux/ramips/dts/FIREWRT.dts
>>>> +++ b/target/linux/ramips/dts/FIREWRT.dts
>>>> @@ -103,6 +103,11 @@
>>>> gpios = <&gpio0 18 1>;
>>>> linux,code = <0x211>;
>>>> };
>>>> + power {
>>>> + label = "power";
>>>> + gpios = <&gpio0 23 1>;
>>>> + linux,code = <116>;
>>>> + };
>>>
>>> Could you break this bad habit and use KEY_* instead of magic numbers?
>>> Like a KEY_POWER.
>>>
>>
>> sure but this is out of scope of this patch and needs to be done
>> globally for all dts files in the ralink target.
>
> I don't mean changing any existing entry, just the one that was
> suggested to be added.
>
> I think it's OK to add it in a correct & nice form?
>
i think that is incosistent to the rest of the code. people add code
based on what is there. expecting them to magically know what you wish
is not consistent tot waht is there. therefore the change needs to be
made globally for all targets and not just for one.
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
