On 10/07/2015 17:19, Karl Palsson wrote: > John Crispin <blo...@openwrt.org> wrote: > > >> On 10/07/2015 13:27, Karl Palsson wrote: >>> Isn't this normally called the "OYE-0001" ? not "OY-0001" ? The website >>> and all literature I've seen uses the "OYE-0001" name... >>> >>> Regardless, in many places, you have not followed the existing >>> alphabetical order. >>> >> there never has been an alphabetic order requirement and many entries >> are not alphabetically sorted > > Lots of requirements have never been written down I'm sure. Most of the > files are generally well sorted. Would you rather they were not sorted? > Is it _bad_ of me to provide cursory review comments that try and steer > towards maintaining clean, ordered lists? Am I making your job more > difficult in any way? > > Sincerely, > Karl P > >
ok agreed, with ar71xx we already have alphabetic order. maybe we should just bite the bullet, sort the ramips scripts and thus also enforcing the ordering on this target _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel