Hello, sorry I did not explain myself correctly.
    $(eval $(call bcm63xxCfe,FAST2604 ,F@ST2604 ,fast2604 ,F@ST2604,...
    $(eval $(call bcm63xxCfe,FAST2704N,FAST2704N,fast2704n,F@ST2704N,...
If I use the the @ symbol in the 3rd argument (DEVICE_NAME), then the kernel does not boot any-more. Looking at all the other builds, the device_name uses the same name as the board_id.

When I said board_id, I really meant the DEVICE_NAME.


On 30/07/2015 20:34, Jonas Gorski wrote:
Hi,

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Matt Goring <matt.gor...@googlemail.com> wrote:
BCM6318: add support for Plusnet / Sagem 2704N (V1)
Signed-off-by: Matt Goring <matt.gor...@googlemail.com>
---
For future submissions, add a changelog here for all the changes
between (re-)submissions.

  target/linux/brcm63xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh       |    3 +
  .../brcm63xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds   |    3 +
  .../base-files/etc/uci-defaults/02_network         |    1 +
  target/linux/brcm63xx/base-files/lib/brcm63xx.sh   |    3 +
  target/linux/brcm63xx/dts/fast2704n.dts            |   84 ++++++++++++++++++++
  target/linux/brcm63xx/image/Makefile               |    2 +
  .../patches-3.18/571-board_fast2704n.patch         |   65 +++++++++++++++
  .../brcm63xx/patches-4.1/571-board_fast2704n.patch |   65 +++++++++++++++
  target/linux/brcm63xx/profiles/sagem.mk            |   10 +++
  9 files changed, 236 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 target/linux/brcm63xx/dts/fast2704n.dts
  create mode 100644 
target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-3.18/571-board_fast2704n.patch
  create mode 100644 target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-4.1/571-board_fast2704n.patch

--- a/target/linux/brcm63xx/image/Makefile
+++ b/target/linux/brcm63xx/image/Makefile
@@ -623,6 +623,8 @@ $(eval $(call 
bcm63xxCfe,FAST2404,F@ST2404,fast2404,F@ST2404,6348))
  $(eval $(call bcm63xxCfe,FAST2504n,F@ST2504n,fast2504n,F@ST2504n,6362))
  # Sagem F@ST2604
  $(eval $(call bcm63xxCfe,FAST2604,F@ST2604,fast2604,F@ST2604,6348))
+# Sagem F@ST2704N V1 / Plusnet F@ST2704N V1
+$(eval $(call bcm63xxCfe,FAST2704N,FAST2704N,fast2704n,F@ST2704N,6318,--pad 4))
I thought using F@ST2704N as the board name in the image does not work?

Rest looks fine.


Jonas

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to