On 11/09/2015 08:53, Etienne Champetier wrote: > > > 2015-09-11 8:46 GMT+02:00 John Crispin <blo...@openwrt.org > <mailto:blo...@openwrt.org>>: > > > > On 11/09/2015 08:39, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > On 11 September 2015 at 07:51, John Crispin <blo...@openwrt.org > <mailto:blo...@openwrt.org>> wrote: > >> On 11/09/2015 07:18, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > >>> On 9 September 2015 at 17:24, Tobias Welz <t...@wiznet.eu > <mailto:t...@wiznet.eu>> wrote: > >>>> BTW: Why does the trunk has to be "renamed". The trunk is always > recent, so > >>>> it could also have a persistent name like "Bleeding Edge" (BTW: is > this a > >>>> cocktail?) and it would be always clear, that you are on the trunk. > Similar > >>>> like Debian Unstable (trunk) is always called "Sid". > >>> > >>> We may wait with branching until some rcX (we did that in past), so we > >>> need a release name in trunk. > >> > >> we just need to change the name inside trunk when we fork. this time we > >> did not do this as we did a public vote for the name and the result was > >> not known when we forked. > > > > I know, my reply was to explain why we *want* names in trunk :) > > > > agreed! I tried to explain why what you and me think is best did not > work out this time :) > > > Now that everyone has explained why it's cool to have a name in trunk, > maybe we can have it :) >
yes, once all the stuff required for doing so is resolved :) as you may have noticed CC-final is already uploaded to the dl server. we did basic testing already and all seems well. only missing bit is that the folder currently shows a 403 and we are waiting on someone that has access to the machine to figure out why. once that is done we will announce CC and change trunk to DD :) _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
