On 2015-09-13 19:51, Hannu Nyman wrote: > Sorry, but what is the problem? > ozlabs patchwork list shows the properly recognised patch: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/517209/ > > But in any case, inline below. > > Hannu > > Index: include/toplevel.mk > =================================================================== > --- include/toplevel.mk (revision 46894) > +++ include/toplevel.mk (working copy) > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ > # See /LICENSE for more information. > # > > -RELEASE:=Chaos Calmer > +RELEASE:=Designated Driver > PREP_MK= OPENWRT_BUILD= QUIET=0 > > export IS_TTY=$(shell tty -s && echo 1 || echo 0) Sending the patch inline as a follow-up, but then not sending it with a proper description does not make things better in any way.
One of the most important reasons to send patches inline is that it allows people to easily review patches and comment on specific parts. Patches should be easy to review *and* easy to apply at the same time. Please start respecting that policy from now on - it's there for a reason. - Felix _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
