On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Steven Barth <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't see this argument as very convincing. I mean they still have > control even if the client ORO's 121, they could simply ignore it. On top > of that I think there are enough clients already (Windows at least IIRC) > who do ORO for 121 by default. > > So, my personal take on this is, we could ORO 121 by default but there > should be a switch to turn that behavior off. > No objection from my side for this solution if the behavior can be turned off via UCI Bye, Hans > > > > Cheers, > > Steven > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
