Am 16.12.2015 um 05:42 schrieb Vittorio G (VittGam):
Signed-off-by: Vittorio Gambaletta <[email protected]>
---
--- a/target/linux/lantiq/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds
+++ b/target/linux/lantiq/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds
@@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ BTHOMEHUBV5A)
ucidef_set_led_netdev "internet" "internet" "soc:blue:broadband"
"pppoa-wan"
ucidef_set_led_default "dimmed" "dimmed" "dimmed" "0"
;;
+TDW8970|TDW8980)
+ ucidef_set_led_wlan "wifi" "wifi" "ath9k-phy0" "phy0tpt"
+ ucidef_set_led_netdev "internet" "internet" "internet" "pppoe-wan"
+ ;;
VGV7510KW22)
ucidef_set_led_default "power" "power" "power" "1"
ucidef_set_led_default "power2" "power2" "power2" "0"
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
This look unnecessary to me.
The default internet led configuration a few lines above, already adds
an internet led with exactly the same values.
The same applies to the wifi led. I can not yet explain why, but the
ath9k-phy0 led has the phy0tpt trigger configured without having the
wifi led defined in 01_led on my TDW8980.
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
