Do you reckon the same issue is affecting the wpj344?
On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 04:06 +0100, Matthias Schiffer wrote: > Signed-off-by: Christian Mehlis <[email protected]> > > Backport of r46282 > --- > target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-wpj531.c | 11 +++++-- > ---- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-wpj531.c > b/target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-wpj531.c > index b106917..2cc2fe8 100644 > --- a/target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-wpj531.c > +++ b/target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-wpj531.c > @@ -94,9 +94,8 @@ static struct gpio_keys_button wpj531_gpio_keys[] > __initdata = { > > static void __init common_setup(void) > { > - u8 *mac = (u8 *) KSEG1ADDR(0x1f01fc00); > - u8 *ee = (u8 *) KSEG1ADDR(0x1fff1000); > - u8 tmpmac[ETH_ALEN]; > + u8 *art = (u8 *) KSEG1ADDR(0x1fff0000); > + u8 *mac = (u8 *) KSEG1ADDR(0x1f02e000); > > ath79_register_m25p80(NULL); > > @@ -109,7 +108,7 @@ static void __init common_setup(void) > ath79_eth0_data.phy_if_mode = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII; > ath79_eth0_data.speed = SPEED_100; > ath79_eth0_data.phy_mask = BIT(4); > - ath79_init_mac(ath79_eth0_data.mac_addr, mac, 0); > + ath79_init_mac(ath79_eth0_data.mac_addr, mac + > WPJ531_MAC0_OFFSET, 0); > ath79_register_eth(0); > > /* WAN */ > @@ -118,10 +117,10 @@ static void __init common_setup(void) > ath79_eth1_data.phy_if_mode = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_GMII; > ath79_eth1_data.speed = SPEED_1000; > ath79_switch_data.phy_poll_mask |= BIT(4); > - ath79_init_mac(ath79_eth1_data.mac_addr, mac, 1); > + ath79_init_mac(ath79_eth1_data.mac_addr, mac + > WPJ531_MAC1_OFFSET, 0); > ath79_register_eth(1); > > - ath79_register_wmac(ee, tmpmac); > + ath79_register_wmac(art + WPJ531_WMAC_CALDATA_OFFSET, NULL); > > ath79_register_pci(); > } _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
