On 04/11/2016 12:18 AM, Stijn Segers wrote: > Op zo, 10 apr 2016 om 11:35 , schreef Matthias Schiffer > <[email protected]>: >> On 04/10/2016 11:21 PM, Stijn Segers wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I'm trying to add support for the TP-Link TL-WR740N v6. >>> On the OpenWrt forums [1] a modified TL-WR841N v10 >>> image has been confirmed working. I tried adding support >>> (see patch below) but no matter what I try, the v6 image >>> does not seem to be generated. Running make with V=s >>> doesn't show any mention of the v6 images being attempted >>> to build (or failing to build) altogether. What am I doing >>> wrong here? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Stijn >> >> Which profile do you have selected in your .config? You have set >> DEVICE_PROFILE := TLWR841 in your patch, so the 740v6 image will be built >> only if Generic or TL-WR841 is selected, but not for TL-WR740/741. >> >> Regards, >> Matthias > > Thanks, it's under TL-WR740 indeed. I've checked other devices in the > Makefile, there are a few > that have board names that don't align with the profile being used, like: > > define Device/tl-wr842n-v1 > $(Device/tplink-8m) > BOARDNAME := TL-MR3420 > DEVICE_PROFILE := TLWR842 > TPLINK_HWID := 0x08420001 > endef > > I will keep the boardname and change the DEVICE_PROFILE to 'TLWR740', see > how that works out. > To be sure, is there anything else the DEVICE_PROFILE value steers, besides > under which profile > the image would be built? > > Cheers > > Stijn
No, DEVICE_PROFILE does exactly that and nothing else. Matthias
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
