On 4 May 2016 at 09:13, Reinoud Koornstra <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Outback Dingo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Roman Yeryomin <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 3 May 2016 at 23:19, Bruno Randolf <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > On 03/05/16 18:59, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: >>> >> we'd like to introduce LEDE, a reboot of the OpenWrt community >>> >> ... >>> >> Jo-Philipp Wich, >>> >> John Crispin, >>> >> Daniel Golle, >>> >> Felix Fietkau, >>> >> Hauke Mehrtens >>> >> John Crispin >>> >> Matthias Schiffer, >>> >> Steven Barth >>> > >>> > While a fresh start and a more open process is good move, given this >>> > list of supporters it sounds a bit ridiculous... who is left in the >>> > OpenWRT boat and why not do it as OpenWRT (V2 or whatever)??? >> >> >> come on.. is this a joke? same names, same faces, if you sliced this list >> off from the current dev group, who is actually left.... anyway.... on that >> note, if its legit, ill jump onboard and throw my hat in the ring also due >> to my trust and respect for those that are listed. > > I am kind of surprised. > There are still daily checkins in the tree. > Still some people are adding support for boards. > Hence I must not understand the notion of inactiveness. > The value of openwrt is still invaluable. > If rebranding helps pumping additional life into it, why not...
I'm not against rebranding but I don't see how it fixes the problem. IMO it only makes it worse. >> >>> >>> >>> Indeed. Looks like silent rebranding. Without public discussion of the >>> issues (and possible ways to fix them) in mailing list Same people, >>> rules and methods. >>> Could you elaborate more and explain how exactly LEDE is going to fix >>> the listed problems? And why it's not possible to fix them inside >>> existing project? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
