I don't see the end of OpenWRT as a bad thing. If LEDE is basically a fork but without the development bottlenecks that seem to be affecting OpenwRT, then the change can be easily done by the industry segment that uses OpenWRT for their products. In fact, I see it as a good thing because it means that there are developers who care about the future of such embedded development environment.
On 5 May 2016 at 12:32, Bruno Randolf <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/05/16 02:02, Kathy Giori wrote: > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Fernando Frediani <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Thanks Daniel. That explains a lot. > >> I imagine if some digging is done it would be possible to find the > holders > >> of the critical resources and then re-organize it from scratch within > the > >> OpenWrt Project. > >> But as the fork has already happened there is no much point in doing > that. > > My conclusion is: As all active OpenWRT core developers have left the > boat there must be something going on behind the scenes, which they feel > can not be fixed within OpenWRT. If they don't change their mind, that's > probably the end of OpenWRT, then... > > bruno > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > -- Carlos Miguel Ferreira Researcher at Telecommunications Institute Aveiro - Portugal Work E-mail - [email protected] Skype & GTalk -> [email protected] LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosmferreira
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
