On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 16:20 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote: > On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 16:46 +0200, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > > Hi Luka, > > > > this is fantastic news! > > > > I'd be very interested in your future progress on the CI front. > > > Let's just not make the mistake other projects make and turn CI into a > an excuse to not have proper releases and a stablisation period before a > stable release that only gets bug fixes afterwards. > > I've seen too many times CI/CD meant to use 'we won't bother with a > release we'll just fix thing on the fly' that ends up really meaning CB > (Continuous Brokeness). (I'd love to see people call CI/CD CI/CD/CB or just > CI/CB so that deluded folks might get a clue).
That's not to say that stable release are perfect or even necessary better than a CD release *but* because it doesn't change much, people who depend on you can be aware of and work around issues you have, rater than dealing with a constantly changing set of problems. Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel