On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:27 PM, tapper <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/05/2017 09:30, Matthias Schiffer wrote: >> >> On 05/11/2017 12:17 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for moving this forward. >>> >>> On 05/08/2017 03:19 PM, John Crispin wrote: >>>> >>>> *) github >>> >>> ..... >>>> >>>> >>>> - obsolete the lede github org after a grace period of 3-6 months >>> >>> >>> As long as it does not cost us effort I would like to keep the lede >>> domains and github project up running for longer. >> >> >> This one is a bit tricky. On the one hand, people are referencing our >> Github repositories in their scripts and dependent projects, so we should >> keep it around at least for a while; on the other hand, Github doesn't >> allow disabling PRs (AFAIK), so deleting the project would give developers >> a clear signal where to contribute. >> >> >>> >>>> *) landing page >>>> - update the lede landing page to represent the openwrt name >>>> - update the landing page to have the same look & feel as the current >>>> openwrt landing page >>>> - point openwrt.org at the lede landing page >>> >>> >>> I prefer the LEDE design, but with the news like content on the OpenWrt >>> page, but I do not really care and will not block the merge about this. >>> Is someone volunteering to prepare a design which also fulfills Imre's >>> requirements, I am also asking the non LEDE committers and non OpenWrt >>> core developers? I am not good at this. ;-) >> >> >> I realize this is bikeshedding, but I also very much prefer the LEDE >> design, it looks much more modern. In particular: >> - everything with a lot of text has a white background; generally colors >> are used sparingly >> - thin grey borders instead of thick black ones >> >> The OpenWrt forum design looks a bit better than the landing page, but it >> still feels too heavy due to the colored backgrounds. >> >> Matthias >> >> >>> >>> Hauke >>> > One more thing about the LEDE forum is it is very hard to use with a screen > reader where as the OpenWRT one is very good to use. For all blind people > could we stick with the Openwrt forum but spruce it up a bit so it looks > better for those of us that can see.
Hi, the used Discourse Software sadly does not seem to make screen readers a priority :(, but they seem interested in feedback[0] Just an idea: Would NNTP Support help here? There seems to be a maintained plugin[1] and if that works well enough, access via any NNTP client or a simple site / forum like the dlang forum[3] that plays well with linux and screen readers might be an option. regards Martin 0: https://meta.discourse.org/t/accessibility-concerns-re-email-lynx-jaws/35675/23 1: https://github.com/sman591/discourse-nntp-bridge 3: http://forum.dlang.org _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
