On 2018-02-22 09:34, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2018-02-22 01:12, Tim Harvey wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Felix Fietkau <n...@nbd.name> wrote:
>>> On 2018-02-20 19:23, Tim Harvey wrote:
>>>> We are using F2FS as our overlay read/write FS. Others can be supported
>>>> as modules.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <thar...@gateworks.com>
>>> I think it would be a good idea to leave in ext4. If the overlay storage
>>> area is too small for f2fs, fstools chooses ext4 instead.
>>>
>>> - Felix
>> 
>> Felix,
>> 
>> That makes sense. I think the other patches apply if that one is
>> skipped, or would you rather I re-submit a new sieres (assuming there
>> is no other feedback)
> No need to resubmit the series, you can send an updated version of this
> patch (removing only ext2/ext3) separately.
No need to do that anymore. It turns out that there were a lot more
bogus config overrides in that target, some of them breaking the build
in various other places.

I've cleaned it up and verified that a build with all kernel modules
enabled now actually works ;)

- Felix
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to