On 2018-04-11 00:51, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Roman Yeryomin <ro...@advem.lv> wrote:
I have tested them quickly yesterday on nas4220b board. Although I've
managed to boot it (had to fix rootfs image) ethernet and usb didn't
work.
And I didn't check anything else.
I didn't yet look at the code but before I dive there I have a
question: did
you have a chance to test it yourself on any of the boards? And if
yes,
which one?
Hm I tested mostly the rootfs and that the kernel would get to prompt.
But for my D-Link devices I tested mostly with kernel v4.16 because
I'm working close to mainline. Testing now it seems network is not
coming up here either :/ as it works like a charm on v4.16 it must
be some minor issue.
Looking at your tree...
I don't see any (affecting) differences in ethernet driver itself.
Probably it's something else.. MDIO?
I would guess Hans Ulli Kroll can help with USB, I just applied the
patches and have nothing to test it with. I never used USB...
Hans, did you have a chance to test 4.14 (or 4.16) on any of gemini
boards?
The v4.16 stack is pretty small and there the network for sure
works (not a finished patch set):
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-nomadik.git/log/?h=openwrt-v4.16
If it's hard to get v4.14 to backport we could maybe aim to
use v4.16 instead? Or is there some OpenWRT baselining involved?
Yeah, generic comes first and that's not 10min work :)
Regards,
Roman
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
