On 2018-05-30 15:49, Daniel Golle wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 03:19:52PM +0530, Sathishkumar Muruganandam wrote:
On 2018-05-30 11:44, John Crispin wrote:
> > ...
> Hi,
>
> the original commit was
>
> commit 35cdc5d722883cac8b524ea803ee7eedca844087
> Author: Felix Fietkau <[email protected]>
> Date:   Sat Oct 23 23:39:54 2010 +0000
>
>     hostapd/mac80211: implement support for AP+STA
>
>     SVN-Revision: 23602
>
> for future reference, you can use one of gits less known features to
> track these down ...
> git log --follow
> package/network/services/hostapd/patches/340-reload_freq_change.patch
>
>     John

Thanks for your reply, John !

We want to go beyond and find more details about the commit message of
each
patch. Is there any way to access "SVN-Revision: 23602" info ?

I guess back at the days of subversion nobody really left more than
one line of a commit message. So what you see above is all there is.


Also whether these patches were already sent for upstream review ? We
were
planning to upstream these patches to hostapd.

No and at least I believe it would be quite difficult to do so.

Thanks for your response Daniel !

Can we have these patches in upstream for supporting the AP +STA mode as
the way present in OpenWrt ? ( only wpa_s on STA interface and hostapd on AP
interface )

The direction of the hostap project seems to be to cover most AP
functionality in wpa_supplicant and have a single process for all
virtual interfaces (or even all radios in a system).
This is how it is done on Android or how NetworkManager creates
a tethering AP.

I understand that this can't be generic solution for devices running single process and wpa_s doing AP stuff. Our intention was to make these patches available in upstream at least for repeater use case where (AP+STA) mode will be following their
associated root AP channel switch events.

Your thoughts please !

On OpenWrt we do things differently and run hostapd for all AP
interfaces and wpa_supplicant for all client and mesh interfaces of
an individual radio. Only this makes signalling between hostapd and
wpa_supplicant necessary.


Any thoughts ?



--
Thanks,
Sathishkumar

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/listinfo/openwrt-devel

--
Thanks,
Sathishkumar

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to