David Bauer <[email protected]> wrote: > Sysupgrading to ath79 from ar71xx currently fails because of > mismatching supported_devices. ar71xx is expecting "tl-mr3020" > which is missing in the ath79 image. Upgrading from ath79 is > unaffected, as the image contains the old string for ar71xx and > the new one coming from the device-tree.
These were removed as "it was intended to be required to force when switching "architectures"" I disagreed then, but it got railed through, so it's good to see I'm not the only one who thought you should be able to upgrade from ar71xx to ath79 on the same hardware.... See also https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/1222 Cheers, Karl P > > Signed-off-by: David Bauer <[email protected]> > --- > target/linux/ath79/image/tiny-tp-link.mk | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/target/linux/ath79/image/tiny-tp-link.mk > b/target/linux/ath79/image/tiny-tp-link.mk index > 6ccc9d7dba..dadcd24b42 100644 > --- a/target/linux/ath79/image/tiny-tp-link.mk > +++ b/target/linux/ath79/image/tiny-tp-link.mk > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ define Device/tplink_tl-mr3020-v1 > DEVICE_TITLE := TP-LINK TL-MR3020 v1 > DEVICE_PACKAGES := kmod-usb-core kmod-usb-chipidea2 > kmod-usb-ledtrig-usbport > TPLINK_HWID := 0x30200001 > - SUPPORTED_DEVICES += tl-mr3020-v1 > + SUPPORTED_DEVICES += tl-mr3020 > endef > TARGET_DEVICES += tplink_tl-mr3020-v1 > > -- > 2.18.0 > > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
signature.html
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
