On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 9:54 AM Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On 19 Dec 2018, at 09:57, Felix Fietkau <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 2018-12-18 17:43, Rosen Penev wrote: > >>> > >> I've tested removing the patch on a 512MB mt7621 device where HIGHMEM > >> is used for the second 256MB. No issues. > > I think to be on the safe side we should test running fuse (ntfs-3g or > > sshfs or something similar) on such a device. If that doesn't turn up > > any weird hangs or data corruption within a few minutes of use, I'm all > > for dropping this patch. > > > > Rosen, is that something you could take a closer look at with your 512MB > device? Just ran a sha256sum on a video file followed by a 10 minute dd read of the whole drive(interrupted) followed by another sha256sum.
They check out. This was on an ntfs formatted drive mounted by ntfs-3g. > > Kevin _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
